For public transport
The federal government should increase funding for public transport within and between Australia's major urban centres and prioritise it over funding for private transport infrastructure projects
7 subscribers
Voted very strongly for public transport
What does this mean?Voted moderately against public transport
-
Eric Abetz
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Simon Birmingham
-
Carol Brown
-
Alex Gallacher
-
Deborah O'Neill
-
Marise Payne
-
Helen Polley
-
Anne Ruston
-
Zed Seselja
-
Glenn Sterle
-
Anne Urquhart
Voted strongly against public transport
What does this mean?Voted very strongly against public transport
What does this mean?Relevant divisions
These divisions relate to the policy “for public transport”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.
Division | Supporters vote | Division outcome |
---|---|---|
19th Apr 2016, 6:49 PM – Senate Motions - Public Transport - Prioritise funding |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a modest majority |
13th Oct 2015, 4:07 PM – Senate Motions — East West Link |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a small majority |
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a large majority |
24th Sep 2014, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - East West Link - Redirect funding to public transport |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a modest majority |
12th May 2010, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - High Speed Rail Network - Feasibility study |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
18th Sep 2007, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Public Transport - Fund public transport |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a large majority |
27th Nov 2006, 4:10 PM – Senate Motions - Newcastle City Council - Renewables and public transport |
Yes | Not passed by a large majority |
10th Aug 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Fuel Prices - Public transport & alternative fuels |
Yes | Not passed by a large majority |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.