We can't say anything concrete about how Louise Pratt voted on public transport
How Louise Pratt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public transport within and between Australia's major urban centres and prioritise it over funding for private transport infrastructure projects
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for public transport” which Louise Pratt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt on this policy.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for public transport” which Louise Pratt could have attended.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2010, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - High Speed Rail Network - Feasibility study |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Louise Pratt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.