Compare how Jordon Steele-John and Mehreen Faruqi voted on transgender rights
Jordon Steele-John
Australian Greens Senator for WA since November 2017
Mehreen Faruqi
Australian Greens Senator for NSW since August 2018
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Jordon Steele-John or Mehreen Faruqi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jordon Steele-John and Mehreen Faruqi on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Jordon Steele-John | Mehreen Faruqi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
12th Sep 2024, 11:58 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 - First Reading - Introduce the bill into the Senate |
No | No | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Jordon Steele-John or Mehreen Faruqi could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".