Compare how Malcolm Roberts and Hollie Hughes voted on transgender rights
Malcolm Roberts
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party Senator for Queensland since July 2019
Hollie Hughes
Liberal Party Senator for NSW since July 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Malcolm Roberts or Hollie Hughes could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Malcolm Roberts and Hollie Hughes on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Malcolm Roberts | Hollie Hughes | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
12th Sep 2024, 11:58 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 - First Reading - Introduce the bill into the Senate |
Yes | Yes | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Malcolm Roberts or Hollie Hughes could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".