Compare how Sam McMahon and Andrew McLachlan voted on transgender rights
Sam McMahon
Former Country Liberal Party Senator for NT July 2019 – May 2022
Andrew McLachlan
Deputy President Senator for SA since July 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Sam McMahon or Andrew McLachlan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon and Andrew McLachlan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Sam McMahon | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
12th Sep 2024, 11:58 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 - First Reading - Introduce the bill into the Senate |
- | Yes | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Sam McMahon or Andrew McLachlan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".