Compare how Guy Barnett and Simon Birmingham voted on uranium export

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Guy Barnett or Simon Birmingham could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Guy Barnett and Simon Birmingham on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Guy Barnett	Simon Birmingham	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Guy Barnett or Simon Birmingham could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Guy Barnett	Simon Birmingham	Supporters vote
12th Feb 2015, 12:15 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy	-	No	No
13th Mar 2013, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - Review all bilateral uranium supply arrangements	-	absent	No
22nd Mar 2012, 1:46 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy - India and other countries standing outside the NPT	-	No	No
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - For export of uranium to India	-	Yes	Yes
31st Oct 2011 – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation - Identify countries that won't sell to	-	No	No
12th Nov 2008, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports — Take into account public opinion and the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties report	No	absent	No
15th Aug 2007, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation - Do not sell to non-NPT parties	No	No	No
13th Aug 2007, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Nonproliferation - Block moves to exempt India from NSG rules	No	No	No
8th Aug 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions — India and the Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty — Encourage to sign	No	No	No
18th Jun 2007, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to Russia	No	No	No
27th Feb 2007, 4:04 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Proliferation - Block US-India deal at NSG meeting and rule out supply of uranium to India	No	-	No
27th Feb 2007, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Weapons — No exporting to non—NPT parties, support support non—proliferation	No	-	No
10th Oct 2006, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation — Against Australia becoming a nuclear fuel supply centre and against sale of uranium to India	absent	-	No
14th Sep 2006, 9:59 AM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Tests at Maralinga — For non—proliferation and against export to non—Treaty states	No	-	No
10th May 2006, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - Oppose export to China	No	-	No
28th Mar 2006, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to India	absent	-	No
28th Feb 2006, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty - Against uranium export to non-Treaty states	No	-	No