Sue Boyce

How do they vote?

Please note that our voting records start in February 2006.

Rebel votes

Sue Boyce has voted against the majority of their party 3 times since entering Parliament in April 2007. explain rebellions

1. edited 7th Oct 2014

   24th Jun 2013, 9:06 PM Senate

   Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Commonwealth funded aged care

   Sue Boyce voted Yes, rebelling against the Liberal Party

   Passed by a small majority

   1 rebellion 86% attendance

2. edited 24th Oct 2014

   20th Jun 2013, 11:28 AM Senate

   Marriage Act Amendment (Recognition of Foreign Marriages for Same-Sex Couples) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

   Sue Boyce voted Yes, rebelling against the Liberal Party

   Not passed by a small majority

   1 rebellion 95% attendance

3. edited 7th Oct 2014

   30th Nov 2009, 11:52 AM Senate

   Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2] and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time

   Sue Boyce voted Yes, rebelling against the Liberal Party

   Not passed by a small majority

   2 rebellions 97% attendance

Recent Votes

Recent votes in parliament that this Senator could have attended.

1. edited 4th Jan 2015

   26th Jun 2014, 12:51 PM Senate

   Motions - Youth Mental Health - Redirect chaplaincy funding to qualified mental health workers

   Sue Boyce was absent

   Not passed by a modest majority

   No rebellions 62% attendance

2. 26th Jun 2014, 12:29 PM Senate

   Committees — Selection of Bills Committee; Report

   Sue Boyce voted Yes

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 87% attendance

3. 26th Jun 2014, 12:24 PM Senate

   Committees — Selection of Bills Committee; Report

   Sue Boyce voted Yes

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 87% attendance

Compare Sue Boyce with someone else

Shows people in order of those who voted always the same as Sue Boyce (100% agreement) to those who never voted the same (0% agreement).

We only compare those votes where both people attended. This may reveal relationships between people that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.