We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Boyce voted on increasing the Newstart Allowance rate
How Sue Boyce voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the Newstart Allowance rate to ensure that it covers basic living costs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Newstart Allowance rate” which Sue Boyce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce on this policy.
| Division | Sue Boyce | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Newstart Allowance rate” which Sue Boyce could have attended.
| Division | Sue Boyce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Jun 2013, 1:34 PM – Senate Social Security Amendment (Supporting More Australians into Work) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Increase Newstart and support single parents |
absent | Yes |
1st Nov 2012, 12:24 PM – Senate Motions - Newstart - Increase |
absent | Yes |
20th Sep 2012, 12:22 PM – Senate Motions - Newstart Allowance - Increase index rate |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sue Boyce was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.