Compare how James McGrath and Eric Abetz voted on unconventional gas mining
James McGrath
Liberal National Party Senator for Queensland since July 2014
Eric Abetz
Former Liberal Party Senator for Tasmania February 1994 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which either James McGrath or Eric Abetz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James McGrath and Eric Abetz on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | James McGrath | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
25th Aug 2021, 4:32 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development (Beetaloo Cooperative Drilling Program) Instrument 2021 - Disallowance |
absent | absent | No |
10th Sep 2012, 9:23 PM – Senate Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Five-year moratorium |
- | No | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which either James McGrath or Eric Abetz could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".