Compare how Helen Coonan and Sarah Hanson-Young voted on uranium export

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Helen Coonan or Sarah Hanson-Young could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Helen Coonan and Sarah Hanson-Young on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Helen Coonan Sarah Hanson-Young Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Helen Coonan or Sarah Hanson-Young could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Helen Coonan Sarah Hanson-Young Supporters vote

12th Feb 2015, 12:15 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy

- Yes No

13th Mar 2013, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - Review all bilateral uranium supply arrangements

- Yes No

22nd Mar 2012, 1:46 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy - India and other countries standing outside the NPT

- Yes No

23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - For export of uranium to India

- No Yes

31st Oct 2011 – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation - Identify countries that won't sell to

- Yes No

12th Nov 2008, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports — Take into account public opinion and the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties report

No Yes No

15th Aug 2007, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation - Do not sell to non-NPT parties

absent - No

13th Aug 2007, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Nonproliferation - Block moves to exempt India from NSG rules

No - No

8th Aug 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions — India and the Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty — Encourage to sign

absent - No

18th Jun 2007, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to Russia

absent - No

27th Feb 2007, 4:04 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Proliferation - Block US-India deal at NSG meeting and rule out supply of uranium to India

absent - No

27th Feb 2007, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Weapons — No exporting to non—NPT parties, support support non—proliferation

absent - No

10th Oct 2006, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation — Against Australia becoming a nuclear fuel supply centre and against sale of uranium to India

absent - No

14th Sep 2006, 9:59 AM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Tests at Maralinga — For non—proliferation and against export to non—Treaty states

No - No

10th May 2006, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - Oppose export to China

absent - No

28th Mar 2006, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Uranium Exports - No export to India

absent - No

28th Feb 2006, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty - Against uranium export to non-Treaty states

absent - No