Compare how Dave Sharma and James Stevens voted on letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)
Dave Sharma
Liberal Party Senator for NSW since November 2023
James Stevens
Liberal Party Representative for Sturt since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which either Dave Sharma or James Stevens could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dave Sharma and James Stevens on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which either Dave Sharma or James Stevens could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Dave Sharma | James Stevens | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||