Compare how Barnaby Joyce and Scott Ludlam voted on live animal export
Barnaby Joyce
National Party Representative for New England since December 2017
Scott Ludlam
Former Australian Greens Senator for WA July 2008 – July 2017
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which either Barnaby Joyce or Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barnaby Joyce and Scott Ludlam on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Barnaby Joyce | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2024, 11:41 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | - | No |
26th Jun 2024, 11:32 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Decline a second reading |
Yes | - | Yes |
19th Jun 2014 – Senate Regulations and Determinations — Australian Meat and Live—stock Industry (Export of Live—stock to Egypt) Repeal Order 2014 — Disallow motion |
- | Yes | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which either Barnaby Joyce or Scott Ludlam could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".