Compare how Phillip Thompson and Louise Miller-Frost voted on letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)
Phillip Thompson
Liberal National Party Representative for Herbert since May 2019
Louise Miller-Frost
Australian Labor Party Representative for Boothby since May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which either Phillip Thompson or Louise Miller-Frost could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Phillip Thompson and Louise Miller-Frost on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which either Phillip Thompson or Louise Miller-Frost could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Phillip Thompson | Louise Miller-Frost | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||