Compare how David Feeney and Chris Evans voted on the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme
David Feeney
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Batman September 2013 – February 2018
Chris Evans
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for WA July 1993 – April 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, which is a cap-and-trade system of emissions trading introduced by the Rudd Labor Government
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme” which either David Feeney or Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Feeney and Chris Evans on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | David Feeney | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2009, 11:52 AM – Senate Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2] and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
25th Nov 2009, 12:42 PM – Senate Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2] and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
13th Aug 2009, 11:13 AM – Senate Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme” which either David Feeney or Chris Evans could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".