Treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should introduce anti-discrimination laws so that a person cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their COVID vaccine status
2 subscribers
Voted consistently for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Voted almost always for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Voted generally for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Voted a mixture of for and against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
-
Andrew Bragg
-
Slade Brockman
-
Claire Chandler
-
Richard Colbeck
-
Perin Davey
-
Jonathon Duniam
-
David Fawcett
-
Susan McDonald
-
Matt O'Sullivan
-
James Paterson
-
Dean Smith
Voted generally against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
-
Wendy Askew
-
Simon Birmingham
-
Michaelia Cash
-
Anthony Chisholm
-
Don Farrell
-
Sarah Henderson
-
Hollie Hughes
-
Jacqui Lambie
-
Malarndirri McCarthy
-
Bridget McKenzie
-
Fatima Payman
-
Barbara Pocock
-
David Pocock
-
Linda Reynolds
-
Anne Ruston
-
Jana Stewart
-
Lidia Thorpe
-
Murray Watt
-
Penny Wong
Voted almost always against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
-
Tim Ayres
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Carol Brown
-
Katy Gallagher
-
Nita Green
-
Sarah Hanson-Young
-
Sue Lines
-
Helen Polley
-
Louise Pratt
-
Jordon Steele-John
-
Glenn Sterle
-
Anne Urquhart
-
Jess Walsh
-
Peter Whish-Wilson
Voted consistently against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
-
Penny Allman-Payne
-
Raff Ciccone
-
Dorinda Cox
-
Lisa Darmanin
-
Mehreen Faruqi
-
Varun Ghosh
-
Karen Grogan
-
Steph Hodgins-May
-
Jenny McAllister
-
Nick McKim
-
Deborah O'Neill
-
Tony Sheldon
-
David Shoebridge
-
Marielle Smith
-
Larissa Waters
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
14th Aug 2024, 10:12 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
Yes |
9th Mar 2023, 1:24 PM – Senate Work Health and Safety Amendment Bill 2022 - in Committee - Prohibiting COVID-19 vaccine discrimination |
Yes |
1st Dec 2022, 5:37 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - in Committee - COVID-19 vaccination status |
Yes |
22nd Nov 2021, 11:14 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute”.
Division | Supporters vote | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.