Treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should introduce anti-discrimination laws so that a person cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their COVID vaccine status
2 subscribers
Voted consistently for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Voted almost always for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Voted generally for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Voted a mixture of for and against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
- Andrew Bragg
- Slade Brockman
- Claire Chandler
- Richard Colbeck
- Perin Davey
- Jonathon Duniam
- David Fawcett
- Susan McDonald
- Matt O'Sullivan
- James Paterson
- Dean Smith
Voted generally against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
- Wendy Askew
- Simon Birmingham
- Michaelia Cash
- Anthony Chisholm
- Don Farrell
- Sarah Henderson
- Hollie Hughes
- Jacqui Lambie
- Malarndirri McCarthy
- Bridget McKenzie
- Fatima Payman
- Barbara Pocock
- David Pocock
- Linda Reynolds
- Anne Ruston
- Jana Stewart
- Lidia Thorpe
- Murray Watt
- Penny Wong
Voted almost always against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
- Tim Ayres
- Catryna Bilyk
- Carol Brown
- Katy Gallagher
- Nita Green
- Sarah Hanson-Young
- Sue Lines
- Helen Polley
- Louise Pratt
- Jordon Steele-John
- Glenn Sterle
- Anne Urquhart
- Jess Walsh
- Peter Whish-Wilson
Voted consistently against treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
- Penny Allman-Payne
- Raff Ciccone
- Dorinda Cox
- Lisa Darmanin
- Mehreen Faruqi
- Varun Ghosh
- Karen Grogan
- Steph Hodgins-May
- Jenny McAllister
- Nick McKim
- Deborah O'Neill
- Tony Sheldon
- David Shoebridge
- Marielle Smith
- Larissa Waters
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
Something not right?Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
14th Aug 2024, 10:12 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
Yes |
9th Mar 2023, 1:24 PM – Senate Work Health and Safety Amendment Bill 2022 - in Committee - Prohibiting COVID-19 vaccine discrimination |
Yes |
1st Dec 2022, 5:37 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - in Committee - COVID-19 vaccination status |
Yes |
22nd Nov 2021, 11:14 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute”.
Division | Supporters vote | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.