We can't say anything concrete about how David Van voted on treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
How David Van voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce anti-discrimination laws so that a person cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their COVID vaccine status
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute” which David Van could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Van on this policy.
| Division | David Van | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Aug 2024, 10:12 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
9th Mar 2023, 1:24 PM – Senate Work Health and Safety Amendment Bill 2022 - in Committee - Prohibiting COVID-19 vaccine discrimination |
absent | Yes |
1st Dec 2022, 5:37 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - in Committee - COVID-19 vaccination status |
absent | Yes |
22nd Nov 2021, 11:14 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute” which David Van could have attended.
| Division | David Van | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Van was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.