7 relevant divisions

Voted moderately for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Something not right?

Voted a mixture of for and against increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Something not right?

Relevant divisions

See detail

These divisions relate to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.

Division Supporters vote Division outcome

14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine

Yes Not passed by a modest majority

12th Sep 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area - Protect cultural heritage values

Yes Not passed by a large majority

3rd May 2016, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Radioactive Waste

Yes (strong) Not passed by a modest majority

19th Mar 2013, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Quinkan Rock Art Galleries - Protect from mining activities

Yes (strong) Not passed by a modest majority

16th Aug 2006, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Burrup Peninsula Rock Art - Protect rock art

Yes (strong) Not passed by a large majority

28th Mar 2006, 5:26 PM – Senate Motions — Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art — Prevent vandalism

Yes Not passed by a small majority

28th Mar 2006, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art - Prevent vandalism

Yes Passed by a small majority

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.