10 relevant divisions

Voted consistently for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Something not right?

Voted almost always for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Something not right?

Voted generally for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Something not right?

We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Something not right?

Relevant divisions

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.

Division Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites”.

Division Supporters vote

7th Oct 2020, 5:25 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Rio Tinto

Yes

11th Jun 2020, 4:16 PM – Senate Motions - Juukan Gorge - Protect First Nations heritage

Yes

25th Feb 2020, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Gas Industry - Protect climate

Yes

14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine

Yes

12th Sep 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area - Protect cultural heritage values

Yes

3rd May 2016, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Radioactive Waste

Yes

19th Mar 2013, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Quinkan Rock Art Galleries - Protect from mining activities

Yes

16th Aug 2006, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Burrup Peninsula Rock Art - Protect rock art

Yes

28th Mar 2006, 5:26 PM – Senate Motions — Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art — Prevent vandalism

Yes

28th Mar 2006, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art - Prevent vandalism

Yes

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.