Reducing taxes for high-income earners
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should reduce the amount of income tax that high-income earners (those who earn over $200,000 per year) must pay each year
5 subscribers
Voted consistently for reducing taxes for high-income earners
- Alex Antic
- Wendy Askew
- Tim Ayres
- Simon Birmingham
- Andrew Bragg
- Slade Brockman
- Ross Cadell
- Claire Chandler
- Raff Ciccone
- Richard Colbeck
- Perin Davey
- Jonathon Duniam
- David Fawcett
- Katy Gallagher
- Nita Green
- Karen Grogan
- Sarah Henderson
- Hollie Hughes
- Jacqui Lambie
- Susan McDonald
- James McGrath
- Bridget McKenzie
- Andrew McLachlan
- Matt O'Sullivan
- James Paterson
- Fatima Payman
- Gerard Rennick
- Anne Ruston
- Paul Scarr
- Tony Sheldon
- Marielle Smith
- David Van
- Jess Walsh
Voted almost always for reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Voted generally for reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Voted a mixture of for and against reducing taxes for high-income earners
- Catryna Bilyk
- Carol Brown
- Anthony Chisholm
- Don Farrell
- Sue Lines
- Jenny McAllister
- Malarndirri McCarthy
- Deborah O'Neill
- Helen Polley
- Louise Pratt
- Glenn Sterle
- Anne Urquhart
- Murray Watt
- Penny Wong
Voted consistently against reducing taxes for high-income earners
- Penny Allman-Payne
- Dorinda Cox
- Mehreen Faruqi
- Sarah Hanson-Young
- Nick McKim
- Barbara Pocock
- David Pocock
- David Shoebridge
- David Smith
- Jordon Steele-John
- Lidia Thorpe
- Larissa Waters
- Peter Whish-Wilson
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
4th Jul 2019, 5:39 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes |
4th Jul 2019 – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes |
21st Jun 2018, 11:55 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Adoption of Report - Don't insist on amendments |
Yes |
21st Jun 2018, 11:41 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Consideration of House of Representatives Message - Don't insist on amendments |
Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 12:59 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 5) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Abandon Stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
7th Sep 2022, 5:34 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Taxation - Stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.