Reducing taxes for high-income earners
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should reduce the amount of income tax that high-income earners (those who earn over $200,000 per year) must pay each year
8 subscribers
Voted consistently for reducing taxes for high-income earners
-
Alex Antic
-
Wendy Askew
-
Tim Ayres
-
Simon Birmingham
-
Andrew Bragg
-
Slade Brockman
-
Ross Cadell
-
Claire Chandler
-
Raff Ciccone
-
Richard Colbeck
-
Perin Davey
-
Jonathon Duniam
-
David Fawcett
-
Katy Gallagher
-
Nita Green
-
Karen Grogan
-
Sarah Henderson
-
Hollie Hughes
-
Jacqui Lambie
-
Susan McDonald
-
James McGrath
-
Bridget McKenzie
-
Andrew McLachlan
-
Matt O'Sullivan
-
James Paterson
-
Fatima Payman
-
Gerard Rennick
-
Anne Ruston
-
Paul Scarr
-
Tony Sheldon
-
Marielle Smith
-
David Van
-
Jess Walsh
Voted almost always for reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Voted generally for reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Voted a mixture of for and against reducing taxes for high-income earners
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Carol Brown
-
Anthony Chisholm
-
Don Farrell
-
Sue Lines
-
Jenny McAllister
-
Malarndirri McCarthy
-
Deborah O'Neill
-
Helen Polley
-
Louise Pratt
-
Glenn Sterle
-
Anne Urquhart
-
Murray Watt
-
Penny Wong
Voted consistently against reducing taxes for high-income earners
-
Penny Allman-Payne
-
Dorinda Cox
-
Mehreen Faruqi
-
Sarah Hanson-Young
-
Nick McKim
-
Barbara Pocock
-
David Pocock
-
David Shoebridge
-
David Smith
-
Jordon Steele-John
-
Lidia Thorpe
-
Larissa Waters
-
Peter Whish-Wilson
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
4th Jul 2019, 5:39 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes |
4th Jul 2019 – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes |
21st Jun 2018, 11:55 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Adoption of Report - Don't insist on amendments |
Yes |
21st Jun 2018, 11:41 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Consideration of House of Representatives Message - Don't insist on amendments |
Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 12:59 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 5) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Abandon Stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
7th Sep 2022, 5:34 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Taxation - Stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.