7 relevant divisions

Voted almost always for reducing taxes for high-income earners

Something not right?

Voted generally for reducing taxes for high-income earners

Something not right?

We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on reducing taxes for high-income earners

Something not right?

Relevant divisions

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.

Division Supporters vote

4th Jul 2019, 5:39 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes

4th Jul 2019 – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes

21st Jun 2018, 11:55 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Adoption of Report - Don't insist on amendments

Yes

21st Jun 2018, 11:41 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Consideration of House of Representatives Message - Don't insist on amendments

Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”.

Division Supporters vote

7th Feb 2023, 12:59 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 5) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Abandon Stage 3 tax cuts

No

26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts

No

7th Sep 2022, 5:34 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Taxation - Stage 3 tax cuts

No

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.