We can't say anything concrete about how Ralph Babet voted on reducing taxes for high-income earners
How Ralph Babet voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce the amount of income tax that high-income earners (those who earn over $200,000 per year) must pay each year
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners” which Ralph Babet could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ralph Babet on this policy.
| Division | Ralph Babet | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners” which Ralph Babet could have attended.
| Division | Ralph Babet | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 12:59 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 5) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Abandon Stage 3 tax cuts |
No | No |
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
absent | No |
7th Sep 2022, 5:34 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Taxation - Stage 3 tax cuts |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ralph Babet has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.