Maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should maintain or increase the amount of funding allocated to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
32 subscribers
Voted a mixture of for and against maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
Something not right?Voted consistently against maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
Something not right?We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
- Catryna Bilyk
- Matthew Canavan
- Michaelia Cash
- David Fawcett
- Sarah Hanson-Young
- Barnaby Joyce
- Jacqui Lambie
- Sue Lines
- James McGrath
- Bridget McKenzie
- Deborah O'Neill
- Helen Polley
- Linda Reynolds
- Anne Ruston
- Dean Smith
- Anne Urquhart
- Larissa Waters
- Peter Whish-Wilson
- Penny Wong
Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
1st Sep 2014, 3:39 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Animal Health Laboratory - Fund CSIRO |
Yes |
14th Feb 2008, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reverse decision to cut funding |
Yes |
9th Feb 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Renewable energy |
Yes |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.