How Jordon Steele-John voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase protections for workers by, for example, ensuring there are adequate dispute resolution processes available

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which Jordon Steele-John could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jordon Steele-John on this policy.

Division Jordon Steele-John Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which Jordon Steele-John could have attended.

Division Jordon Steele-John Supporters vote

19th Sep 2024, 3:34 PM – Senate Australian Human Rights Commission Amendment (Costs Protection) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

19th Sep 2024, 10:45 AM – Senate Australian Human Rights Commission Amendment (Costs Protection) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

7th Dec 2023, 12:32 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

7th Dec 2023, 12:24 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

10th Dec 2020, 7:35 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Safety - Industrial manslaughter

Yes Yes

10th Nov 2020, 1:56 PM – Senate Economic Recovery Package (Jobmaker Hiring Credit) Amendment Bill 2020 - in Committee - Dispute resolution

absent Yes

10th Nov 2020, 1:46 PM – Senate Economic Recovery Package (Jobmaker Hiring Credit) Amendment Bill 2020 - in Committee - Safeguards

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Jordon Steele-John has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.