How Ian Campbell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the protection of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage sites

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which Ian Campbell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ian Campbell on this policy.

Division Ian Campbell Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which Ian Campbell could have attended.

Division Ian Campbell Supporters vote

16th Aug 2006, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Burrup Peninsula Rock Art - Protect rock art

No Yes

28th Mar 2006, 5:26 PM – Senate Motions — Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art — Prevent vandalism

absent Yes

28th Mar 2006, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art - Prevent vandalism

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Ian Campbell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.