Compare how David Johnston and Catryna Bilyk voted on creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission
David Johnston
Former Liberal Party Senator for WA July 2002 – May 2016
Catryna Bilyk
Australian Labor Party Senator for Tasmania since July 2008
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should create a national integrity commission similar to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to detect, investigate and prevent corruption across all Commonwealth departments and agencies
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which either David Johnston or Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Johnston and Catryna Bilyk on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | David Johnston | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2019, 11:50 AM – Senate National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
- | absent | Yes |
9th Sep 2019, 11:41 AM – Senate National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
- | absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which either David Johnston or Catryna Bilyk could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".