Compare how Christopher Back and Anne Ruston voted on restricting donations to political parties
Christopher Back
Former Liberal Party Senator for WA March 2009 – July 2017
Anne Ruston
Liberal Party Senator for SA since September 2012
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce restrictions to the amount and type of donations that political parties can receive in order to prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption in government
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting donations to political parties” which either Christopher Back or Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Christopher Back and Anne Ruston on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Christopher Back | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
11th Mar 2009, 12:19 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [2009] - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
absent | - | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting donations to political parties” which either Christopher Back or Anne Ruston could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".