Compare how Nick McKim and Christopher Back voted on increasing investment in the coal industry
![Photo of Nick McKim](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10841.jpg)
Nick McKim
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since August 2015
![Photo of Christopher Back](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10722.jpg)
Christopher Back
Former Liberal Party Senator for WA March 2009 – July 2017
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase its investment in and support for the Australian coal industry
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Nick McKim or Christopher Back could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim and Christopher Back on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Nick McKim | Christopher Back | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Nick McKim or Christopher Back could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".