Compare how Nick McKim and David Smith voted on live animal export
Nick McKim
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since August 2015
David Smith
Australian Labor Party Representative for Bean since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which either Nick McKim or David Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim and David Smith on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Nick McKim | David Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2024, 11:41 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
- | Yes | No |
26th Jun 2024, 11:32 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Decline a second reading |
- | No | Yes |
10th Sep 2018, 11:35 AM – Senate Animal Export Legislation Amendment (Ending Long-Haul Live Sheep Exports) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | Yes | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which either Nick McKim or David Smith could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".