We can't say anything concrete about how Grant Chapman voted on decreasing the gender pay gap
How Grant Chapman voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Grant Chapman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Grant Chapman on this policy.
| Division | Grant Chapman | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Grant Chapman could have attended.
| Division | Grant Chapman | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Commission on the Status of Women - End discrimination and gender-based violence |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Grant Chapman has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.