Compare how Annette Hurley and Sue Boyce voted on increasing the age pension

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which either Annette Hurley or Sue Boyce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Annette Hurley and Sue Boyce on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Annette Hurley	Sue Boyce	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which either Annette Hurley or Sue Boyce could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Annette Hurley	Sue Boyce	Supporters vote
15th Oct 2008, 3:38 PM – Senate Motions - Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition (FGFP) - Consider incorporating FGFP's statement of claims	No	No	Yes
16th Aug 2007, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Age Pension - Increase age pension	No	No	Yes