Compare how Anne McEwen and Ruth Webber voted on increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which either Anne McEwen or Ruth Webber could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne McEwen and Ruth Webber on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anne McEwen	Ruth Webber	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which either Anne McEwen or Ruth Webber could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anne McEwen	Ruth Webber	Supporters vote
3rd May 2016, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Radioactive Waste	No	-	Yes
19th Mar 2013, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Quinkan Rock Art Galleries - Protect from mining activities	No	-	Yes
16th Aug 2006, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Burrup Peninsula Rock Art - Protect rock art	No	No	Yes
28th Mar 2006, 5:26 PM – Senate Motions — Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art — Prevent vandalism	Yes	Yes	Yes
28th Mar 2006, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art - Prevent vandalism	Yes	Yes	Yes