We can't say anything concrete about how Amanda Vanstone voted on public transport
How Amanda Vanstone voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public transport within and between Australia's major urban centres and prioritise it over funding for private transport infrastructure projects
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for public transport” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Vanstone on this policy.
| Division | Amanda Vanstone | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for public transport” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended.
| Division | Amanda Vanstone | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Nov 2006, 4:10 PM – Senate Motions - Newcastle City Council - Renewables and public transport |
absent | Yes |
10th Aug 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Fuel Prices - Public transport & alternative fuels |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Amanda Vanstone was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.