Compare how Sue Boyce and David Feeney voted on decreasing the gender pay gap

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which either Sue Boyce or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	David Feeney	Supporters vote
22nd Nov 2012, 8:30 PM – Senate Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which either Sue Boyce or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	David Feeney	Supporters vote
19th Jun 2013, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Health - Inquiry into unpaid care	absent	No	Yes
23rd Aug 2012, 12:08 PM – Senate Motions - Inequality - Introduce a Federal Equality Act	absent	No	Yes