Compare how Sue Boyce and David Feeney voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which either Sue Boyce or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	David Feeney	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which either Sue Boyce or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	David Feeney	Supporters vote
14th Sep 2011 – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Reverse biodiversity decline	No	No	Yes
8th Sep 2009, 3:44 PM – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Management plans	absent	No	Yes
19th Mar 2009, 9:49 AM – Senate Motions - Protect the Swift Parrot - Deliberate Actions and Recovery Plan	absent	absent	Yes
13th Aug 2007, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Yangtze River Dolphin - Implement management plans	No	-	Yes