How Santo Santoro voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public transport within and between Australia's major urban centres and prioritise it over funding for private transport infrastructure projects

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for public transport” which Santo Santoro could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Santo Santoro on this policy.

Division Santo Santoro Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for public transport” which Santo Santoro could have attended.

Division Santo Santoro Supporters vote

27th Nov 2006, 4:10 PM – Senate Motions - Newcastle City Council - Renewables and public transport

No Yes

10th Aug 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Fuel Prices - Public transport & alternative fuels

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Santo Santoro has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.