How Jacinta Nampijinpa Price voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect threatened forest and bushland habitats from logging.

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Jacinta Nampijinpa Price could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price on this policy.

Division Jacinta Nampijinpa Price Supporters vote

11th Sep 2024, 10:07 AM – Senate Ending Native Forest Logging Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

15th Jun 2023, 10:10 AM – Senate Ending Native Forest Logging Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Jacinta Nampijinpa Price could have attended.

Division Jacinta Nampijinpa Price Supporters vote

9th Sep 2024, 12:12 PM – Senate Illegal Logging Prohibition Amendment (Strengthening Measures to Prevent Illegal Timber Trade) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Native forests

absent Yes

9th Sep 2024, 12:04 PM – Senate Illegal Logging Prohibition Amendment (Strengthening Measures to Prevent Illegal Timber Trade) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Ending Native Forest Logging Bill 2023

absent Yes

22nd Jun 2023, 4:01 PM – Senate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Prohibited financial assistance

absent Yes

28th Mar 2023, 8:24 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - in Committee - No financing goal, gas and native forest logging

No Yes

7th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Global Biodiversity Framework - End native forest logging

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.