We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Molan voted on self-governance of the territories
How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not interfere in, nor intervene with, the governance of federal territories - such as the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) or the Northern Territory (NT) - and should allow those territories to create and uphold their own laws
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for self-governance of the territories” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for self-governance of the territories” which Jim Molan could have attended.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 9:26 AM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
15th Aug 2018, 7:03 PM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights (Assisted Suicide Legislation) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jim Molan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.