Compare how Jim Molan and David Leyonhjelm voted on transgender rights

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Jim Molan or David Leyonhjelm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan and David Leyonhjelm on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Jim Molan David Leyonhjelm Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which either Jim Molan or David Leyonhjelm could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Jim Molan David Leyonhjelm Supporters vote

30th Nov 2022, 4:18 PM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs References Committee; Reference - Puberty blockers and disproven theory

absent - No

15th Jun 2021, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - Gender Dysphoria - Treating gender diverse children

absent - No

16th Mar 2021, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Gender Language - Concerns about "distorted" language

Yes - No

13th Nov 2019, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - Transgender Awareness Week - Support

absent - Yes

3rd Dec 2018, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Gender and Sexual Orientation - Healthcare and gender diverse treatment

No No Yes

16th Aug 2018, 12:37 PM – Senate Motions - Free Speech - Against gender neutral language

Yes Yes No