Compare how Concetta Fierravanti-Wells and David Feeney voted on live animal export
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells
Former Liberal Party Senator for NSW May 2005 – May 2022
David Feeney
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Batman September 2013 – February 2018
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which either Concetta Fierravanti-Wells or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Concetta Fierravanti-Wells | David Feeney | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
10th Sep 2018, 11:35 AM – Senate Animal Export Legislation Amendment (Ending Long-Haul Live Sheep Exports) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | - | No |
19th Jun 2014 – Senate Regulations and Determinations — Australian Meat and Live—stock Industry (Export of Live—stock to Egypt) Repeal Order 2014 — Disallow motion |
absent | - | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which either Concetta Fierravanti-Wells or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".