How Andrew Giles voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for the vocational education sector, which includes TAFEs, apprenticeships and traineeships

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Andrew Giles could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Giles on this policy.

Division Andrew Giles Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Andrew Giles could have attended.

Division Andrew Giles Supporters vote

10th Jun 2020, 7:12 PM – Representatives National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged

absent No

10th Feb 2020, 7:10 PM – Representatives Student Identifiers Amendment (Enhanced Student Permissions) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Support vocational education

Yes Yes

10th Feb 2020, 5:46 PM – Representatives Trade Support Loans Amendment (Improving Administration) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Support vocational education

Yes Yes

24th Oct 2019 – Representatives Education Legislation Amendment (Tuition Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2019 and two others - Second Reading - State of TAFE and universities

Yes Yes

How "voted consistently for" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 0
MP voted against policy 0% 25 0
MP absent 50% 25 0
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 3
MP voted against policy 0% 5 0
MP absent 50% 1 1

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 15.5 / 16 = 97%.

And then this average agreement score