For a review of parliamentary entitlements
The federal government should set up a review of parliamentary entitlements and allowances, including legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and other allowances
14 subscribers
Voted very strongly for a review of parliamentary entitlements
What does this mean?
Voted moderately against a review of parliamentary entitlements
-
![Photo of Eric Abetz]()
Eric Abetz
-
![Photo of Carol Brown]()
Carol Brown
-
![Photo of Kim Carr]()
Kim Carr
-
![Photo of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells]()
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells
-
![Photo of Ian Macdonald]()
Ian Macdonald
-
![Photo of Marise Payne]()
Marise Payne
-
![Photo of Helen Polley]()
Helen Polley
-
![Photo of Nigel Scullion]()
Nigel Scullion
-
![Photo of Penny Wong]()
Penny Wong
Voted very strongly against a review of parliamentary entitlements
-
![Photo of Catryna Bilyk]()
Catryna Bilyk
-
![Photo of Simon Birmingham]()
Simon Birmingham
-
![Photo of Doug Cameron]()
Doug Cameron
-
![Photo of Michaelia Cash]()
Michaelia Cash
-
![Photo of Mathias Cormann]()
Mathias Cormann
-
![Photo of Mitch Fifield]()
Mitch Fifield
-
![Photo of Claire Moore]()
Claire Moore
-
![Photo of Glenn Sterle]()
Glenn Sterle
-
![Photo of John Williams]()
John Williams
Relevant divisions
These divisions relate to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.
| Division | Supporters vote | Division outcome |
|---|---|---|
16th Jun 2009, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Independent Parliamentary Standards Commissioner |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a large majority |
6th Sep 2006, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians’ Entitlements - Review of remuneration and entitlements |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a large majority |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.