For Senate electoral reform

The federal government should change the laws governing Senate elections to allow voters more direct control over the flow of preferences, whether they vote above or below the line

6 relevant divisions

Voted very strongly for Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Voted strongly for Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Voted moderately for Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Voted moderately against Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Voted strongly against Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Voted very strongly against Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Never voted on Senate electoral reform

What does this mean?

Relevant divisions

These divisions relate to the policy “for Senate electoral reform”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.

Division Supporters vote Division outcome

17th Mar 2016, 5:21 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes (strong) Passed by a small majority

17th Mar 2016, 3:27 PM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments

Yes (strong) Passed by a modest majority

17th Mar 2016, 1:30 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes (strong) Passed by a small majority

17th Mar 2016, 12:58 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - in Committee - Agree to the bill

Yes (strong) Passed by a small majority

2nd Mar 2016, 11:45 AM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - First Reading - Read for the first time

Yes (strong) Passed by a small majority

24th Feb 2016, 4:49 PM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea

Yes (strong) Passed by a small majority

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.