7 relevant divisions

Voted almost always for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship

Something not right?

We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship

Something not right?

Relevant divisions

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.

Division Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship”.

Division Supporters vote

16th Jun 2021, 7:12 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee' Reference - China

Yes

10th Jun 2020, 6:24 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference - China

Yes

3rd Dec 2019, 7:10 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Australia's relationship with China

Yes

11th Nov 2019, 5:50 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference

Yes

9th Sep 2019, 9:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference

Yes

13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee

Yes

14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission

Yes

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.