5 relevant divisions

Voted very strongly for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship

What does this mean?

Voted moderately for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship

What does this mean?

Never voted on increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship

What does this mean?

Relevant divisions

See detail

These divisions relate to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.

Division Supporters vote Division outcome

10th Jun 2020, 6:24 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference - China

Yes Not passed by a modest majority

3rd Dec 2019, 7:10 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Australia's relationship with China

Yes (strong) Not passed by a modest majority

11th Nov 2019, 5:50 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference

Yes (strong) Not passed by a modest majority

13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee

Yes Not passed by a modest majority

14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission

Yes Not passed by a modest majority

If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.