For increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
The Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China
5 subscribers
Voted very strongly for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
What does this mean?Voted strongly for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
What does this mean?Voted moderately for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
What does this mean?Voted a mixture of for and against increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
-
Michaelia Cash
-
Anthony Chisholm
-
Don Farrell
-
Kimberley Kitching
-
Marise Payne
-
Linda Reynolds
-
Anne Ruston
-
Scott Ryan
-
Penny Wong
Voted moderately against increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
-
Eric Abetz
-
Carol Brown
-
Matthew Canavan
-
David Fawcett
-
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells
-
Katy Gallagher
-
Jane Hume
-
Kristina Keneally
-
Sue Lines
-
Jenny McAllister
-
Malarndirri McCarthy
-
James McGrath
-
Bridget McKenzie
-
Jim Molan
-
Deborah O'Neill
-
Helen Polley
-
Zed Seselja
-
Glenn Sterle
-
Amanda Stoker
-
Anne Urquhart
-
Murray Watt
Voted very strongly against increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
-
Alex Antic
-
Wendy Askew
-
Tim Ayres
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Andrew Bragg
-
Slade Brockman
-
Kim Carr
-
Claire Chandler
-
Raff Ciccone
-
Richard Colbeck
-
Perin Davey
-
Patrick Dodson
-
Jonathon Duniam
-
Alex Gallacher
-
Nita Green
-
Sarah Henderson
-
Hollie Hughes
-
Susan McDonald
-
Andrew McLachlan
-
Sam McMahon
-
Matt O'Sullivan
-
James Paterson
-
Louise Pratt
-
Gerard Rennick
-
Paul Scarr
-
Tony Sheldon
-
David Smith
-
Dean Smith
-
Marielle Smith
-
David Van
-
Jess Walsh
Never voted on increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
What does this mean?Relevant divisions
These divisions relate to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.
Division | Supporters vote | Division outcome |
---|---|---|
10th Jun 2020, 6:24 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference - China |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
3rd Dec 2019, 7:10 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Australia's relationship with China |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a modest majority |
11th Nov 2019, 5:50 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference |
Yes (strong) | Not passed by a modest majority |
9th Sep 2019, 9:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.