For funding the national school chaplaincy program
The federal government should continue to fund the National School Chaplaincy Program (NSCP) to fund chaplains in Australian primary and secondary schools
10 subscribers
Voted very strongly for funding the national school chaplaincy program
-
![Photo of Mathias Cormann]()
Mathias Cormann
-
![Photo of David Fawcett]()
David Fawcett
-
![Photo of Mitch Fifield]()
Mitch Fifield
-
![Photo of Alex Gallacher]()
Alex Gallacher
-
![Photo of Bridget McKenzie]()
Bridget McKenzie
-
![Photo of Anne Ruston]()
Anne Ruston
-
![Photo of Zed Seselja]()
Zed Seselja
-
![Photo of Dean Smith]()
Dean Smith
-
![Photo of Anne Urquhart]()
Anne Urquhart
Voted moderately for funding the national school chaplaincy program
What does this mean?
Voted a mixture of for and against funding the national school chaplaincy program
What does this mean?
Voted very strongly against funding the national school chaplaincy program
What does this mean?
Never voted on funding the national school chaplaincy program
What does this mean?
Relevant divisions
These divisions relate to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.
| Division | Supporters vote | Division outcome |
|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2014, 12:51 PM – Senate Motions - Youth Mental Health - Redirect chaplaincy funding to qualified mental health workers |
No (strong) | Not passed by a modest majority |
27th Jun 2012, 6:22 PM – Senate Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 3) 2012 - Second Reading - Replace chaplaincy with counselling |
No | Not passed by a modest majority |
25th Nov 2009, 4:25 PM – Senate Motions - National School Chaplaincy Program - Continue program |
Yes (strong) | Passed by a small majority |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.