Re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should, in relation to agricultural and veterinary ('agvet') chemicals, implement a mandatory scheme for the re-approval of active constituents and re-registration of chemical products to ensure their ongoing safety
13 subscribers
Be careful!
Without a magic crystal ball, there's no way to predict with absolute certainty what representatives will do in future, no matter what they promise you now or how they voted in the past.
Nonetheless, exploring how they voted before can help you decide who to support in an election.
Voted consistently for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
-
Anthony Albanese
-
Adam Bandt
-
Chris Bowen
-
Tony Burke
-
Mark Butler
-
Jason Clare
-
Julie Collins
-
Mark Dreyfus
-
Justine Elliot
-
Steve Georganas
-
Sarah Hanson-Young
-
Ed Husic
-
Stephen Jones
-
Catherine King
-
Andrew Leigh
-
Richard Marles
-
Rob Mitchell
-
Shayne Neumann
-
Brendan O'Connor
-
Graham Perrett
-
Tanya Plibersek
-
Louise Pratt
-
Amanda Rishworth
-
Michelle Rowland
-
Bill Shorten
-
Matt Thistlethwaite
-
Maria Vamvakinou
-
Larissa Waters
-
Peter Whish-Wilson
-
Andrew Wilkie
-
Tony Zappia
Voted almost always for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
Something not right?Voted generally for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
Something not right?Voted consistently against re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
-
Karen Andrews
-
Simon Birmingham
-
Russell Broadbent
-
Scott Buchholz
-
Michaelia Cash
-
Darren Chester
-
Richard Colbeck
-
Mark Coulton
-
Peter Dutton
-
David Fawcett
-
Paul Fletcher
-
Alex Hawke
-
Barnaby Joyce
-
Sussan Ley
-
Nola Marino
-
Michael McCormack
-
Bridget McKenzie
-
Rowan Ramsey
-
Anne Ruston
-
Dean Smith
-
Dan Tehan
-
Bert Van Manen
-
Ross Vasta
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
Something not right?Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
28th Jun 2013, 11:08 AM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
Yes |
15th May 2013, 1:43 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
25th Jun 2014, 12:32 PM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment (Removing Re-approval and Re-registration) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No |
15th May 2013, 1:36 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process |
No |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.