For independent reviews of significant legal changes
When a bill makes a significant change to existing law, the federal government should make sure the bill includes a provision that requires an independent review to take place after a defined period to ensure that the new regime is operating as intended
1 subscriber
Voted very strongly for independent reviews of significant legal changes
-
Mehreen Faruqi
-
Stirling Griff
-
Sarah Hanson-Young
-
Nick McKim
-
Janet Rice
-
Rachel Siewert
-
Jordon Steele-John
-
Larissa Waters
-
Peter Whish-Wilson
Voted strongly for independent reviews of significant legal changes
-
Tim Ayres
-
Anthony Chisholm
-
Raff Ciccone
-
Patrick Dodson
-
Don Farrell
-
Pauline Hanson
-
Kristina Keneally
-
Kimberley Kitching
-
Deborah O'Neill
-
Helen Polley
-
Murray Watt
Voted a mixture of for and against independent reviews of significant legal changes
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Carol Brown
-
Kim Carr
-
Katy Gallagher
-
Jacqui Lambie
-
Sue Lines
-
Jenny McAllister
-
Malarndirri McCarthy
-
Louise Pratt
-
Malcolm Roberts
-
Tony Sheldon
-
Glenn Sterle
-
Anne Urquhart
-
Jess Walsh
Voted strongly against independent reviews of significant legal changes
What does this mean?Voted very strongly against independent reviews of significant legal changes
-
Eric Abetz
-
Alex Antic
-
Wendy Askew
-
Andrew Bragg
-
Slade Brockman
-
Matthew Canavan
-
Claire Chandler
-
Perin Davey
-
Jonathon Duniam
-
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells
-
Alex Gallacher
-
Nita Green
-
Sarah Henderson
-
Hollie Hughes
-
Jane Hume
-
Susan McDonald
-
James McGrath
-
Bridget McKenzie
-
Andrew McLachlan
-
Sam McMahon
-
Jim Molan
-
Matt O'Sullivan
-
Gerard Rennick
-
Linda Reynolds
-
Anne Ruston
-
Scott Ryan
-
Paul Scarr
-
Zed Seselja
-
Dean Smith
-
Amanda Stoker
-
David Van
Never voted on independent reviews of significant legal changes
What does this mean?Relevant divisions
These divisions relate to the policy “for independent reviews of significant legal changes”. Compare how a supporter of the policy would have voted to the division outcome.
Division | Supporters vote | Division outcome |
---|---|---|
15th Jun 2020, 12:44 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Regulation of Migration Agents) Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - Independent review |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
26th Feb 2020, 6:52 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Simplifying Income Reporting and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Review |
Yes | Passed by a small majority |
5th Dec 2019, 4:34 PM – Senate Australian Crime Commission Amendment (Special Operations and Special Investigations) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Statutory review |
Yes | Not passed by a modest majority |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.