We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Lines voted on increasing funding for vocational education
How Sue Lines voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for the vocational education sector, which includes TAFEs, apprenticeships and traineeships
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Sue Lines could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines on this policy.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2019, 11:49 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - $1 billion to TAFE |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Sue Lines could have attended.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2021, 12:29 PM – Senate Motions - Employment, Western Australia - Resources Industry skills shortage |
Yes | Yes |
17th Oct 2019, 11:31 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2019 - in Committee - The Education Investment Fund |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sue Lines has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.