How Sue Lines voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Sue Lines could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines on this policy.

Division Sue Lines Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Sue Lines could have attended.

Division Sue Lines Supporters vote

2nd Dec 2021, 11:08 AM – Senate Electoral Legislation Amendment (Annual Disclosure Equality) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Lower disclosure threshold to $1K

absent Yes

24th Feb 2020, 4:11 PM – Senate Motions - Parliament - Transparency

absent Yes

12th Nov 2018, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Political Donations - Increase disclosure requirements

absent Yes

16th Aug 2018, 12:06 PM – Senate Motions - Donations to Political Parties - Disclosure

absent Yes

3rd Dec 2013 – Senate Motions - Political Donations - Disclosure and ban on overseas donations

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Sue Lines has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.