Compare how Scott Ludlam and Matt Thistlethwaite voted on increasing restrictions on gambling
Scott Ludlam
Former Australian Greens Senator for WA July 2008 – July 2017
Matt Thistlethwaite
Australian Labor Party Representative for Kingsford Smith since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Scott Ludlam or Matt Thistlethwaite could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ludlam and Matt Thistlethwaite on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Ludlam | Matt Thistlethwaite | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Scott Ludlam or Matt Thistlethwaite could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Ludlam | Matt Thistlethwaite | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Apply the National Consumer Protection Framework |
Yes | - | Yes |
8th Feb 2017, 5:11 PM – Representatives Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Phase out ads relating to betting or gambling |
- | Yes | Yes |
12th Sep 2016, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Against gambling advertising |
Yes | - | Yes |
22nd Sep 2014, 6:08 PM – Senate Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Interactive Gambling Act and ACMA |
absent | - | No |
5th Mar 2014, 12:27 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 — In Committee — Keep schedule 1 (on gambling) unchanged |
absent | - | No |
9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents |
Yes | No | Yes |