Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.

Division	Patrick Dodson	Supporters vote
3rd Aug 2021, 5:51 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development - Disallow two instruments	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.

Division	Patrick Dodson	Supporters vote
14th Nov 2023, 12:36 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Australia's Engagement in the Pacific) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Fossil fuels	absent	Yes
30th Mar 2023, 1:21 PM – Senate Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023 - in Committee - Fossil fuel programs	absent	Yes
15th Dec 2022, 4:10 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Energy Price Relief Plan) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Fossil fuel subsidies	No	Yes
26th Sep 2022, 11:23 AM – Senate Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Benefit to Australia) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Cth royality, subsidies, and costs	absent	Yes
16th Jun 2021, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - G7 resolutions	absent	Yes
13th May 2021, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Stop funding fossil fuels	absent	Yes
2nd Dec 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Withdraw support for Adani	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Patrick Dodson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.