How Patrick Dodson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.

Division Patrick Dodson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.

Division Patrick Dodson Supporters vote

6th Mar 2023, 6:32 PM – Senate Higher Education Support Amendment (Australia's Economic Accelerator) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets

Yes Yes

8th Sep 2022, 2:07 PM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bills

absent Yes

8th Sep 2022, 10:16 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea

absent Yes

3rd Dec 2020, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Kyoto carryover credits

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 4:35 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address and adapt

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 4:12 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address

absent Yes

4th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM – Senate Documents - Climate Change - Withdraw from Paris Climate Accord

absent No

14th Aug 2018, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Withdraw

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Patrick Dodson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.