Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Patrick Dodson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Dodson on this policy.

Division	Patrick Dodson	Supporters vote
28th Mar 2023, 8:04 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - in Committee - Consider biodiversity	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Patrick Dodson could have attended.

Division	Patrick Dodson	Supporters vote
7th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Global Biodiversity Framework - End native forest logging	absent	Yes
2nd Feb 2021, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - White Rock Quarry - Halt expansion	absent	Yes
30th Nov 2020, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Environment - Protect Koala Habitat	absent	Yes
4th Dec 2018, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity - Heed recommendations	absent	Yes
14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine	No	Yes
7th Sep 2017, 12:36 PM – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Government support for research & conservation	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Patrick Dodson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.